Criteria and Indicators of Co-Management

Jan 19, 2017

As co-management partners seek to work together they are faced with the challenges of identifying a common vision and then of judging the process and the achievement of shared goals. One of the requirements for proper implementation of co-management is effective monitoring and evaluation. A case study of the John Prince Research Forest (JPRF) was done to provide insight into the values of local co-management partners and stakeholders, both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal.  By talking to experts from Tl’azt’en Nation, the University of Northern British Columbia (UNBC), and Fort St. James through a community-centred process, 19 criteria and 86 indicators (C&I)  were identified to evaluate JPRF results and impacts. This research attempts to democratize the process of C&I development and   a mixed methods approach, including unique expert selection, idea generation, and framework analysis techniques were used to develop and analyse the outcomes of the research.  

Criteria and indicators provide a valuable tool to reflect on progress, initiate learning, and promote action. JPRF criteria and indicators capture values of critical importance to local people who experience co-management first hand and who have their own definitions of sustainability and success.   This research illuminated the multi-faceted ways in which co-management outcomes are conceived by local people as well as the critical processes that they identified as important for successful co-management.